This single-paragraph order summarises a writ petition where the petitioner's counsel stated he had no instructions. The court took a memo on record and dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) NO. 6832 OF 2020
M/s Shakti Timber
…. Petitioner
Mr. R.K. Barik, Advocate -versus- The State of Odisha and another …. Opp. Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
06.11.2023
2 . The Petitioner in this writ petition seeks to assail the Notification No.10F(TR)-34/201925023/F&E dated 20th December, 2019, whereby Rule 4 of the Orissa Timber and other Forest Produce Transit Rules, 1980 has been amended.
bks
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BIJAY KUMAR SAHOO Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, C utta ck Date: 07-Nov-2023 10:50:04
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition is maintainable to assail the amendment of Rule 4 of the Orissa Timber and other Forest Produce Transit Rules, 1980.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M/s Shakti Timber
The State of Odisha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
