The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an execution court order due to the petitioner counsel stating they had no instruction, resulting in non-prosecution.
The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA SAHOO Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 07-Nov-2023 17:44:32
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 31062 OF 2011 Muniga Bewa and others …. Petitioners Mr. U.C. Mishra, Advocate
-versus-
Digambar Rana
…. Opp. Party
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
06.11.2023
by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Bhawanipatna in Execution Case No.23 of 1993 is under challenge in this writ petition, whereby an application under Order XXI Rule 97 CPC as well as an application dated 16th November, 2011, stood rejected.
ms
Page 1 of 1
Muniga Bewa and others
Digambar Rana
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
