Petitioner challenged a transfer order allegedly made under specific-provisions. The impugned order was cancelled by the authority and replaced by a fresh order, rendering the present writ petition infructuous.
Petitioner granted liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition against the fresh order passed by the authority over the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.6740 of 2023
Bikash Khatua
Petitioner
Ms.S.Mohapatra, , Advocate
-versus-
Order No.
….
Union of India and others Opposite Parties
Mr.P.K.Parhi, D.S.G.I.
Mr.B.K.Pardhi, C.G.C
CORAM:
JUSTICE A.K.MOHAPATRA
ORDER
11.12.2023
Signature Not Verified
(A.K. Mohapatra) Judge
Digitally Signed Signed by: RAMESH KUMAR SINGH Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 16-Dec-2023 15:54:18
RKS
Page 1 of 2
Bikash Khatua
Union of India and others
A.K. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
