The High Court of Orissa disposed of the writ petition analogous to a previous order. Relying on Sarat Chandra Parida v. State of Odisha, the court held the petitioner entitled to pensionary and retiral benefits.
Directed opposite parties to extend pensionary and other retiral benefits to the petitioner within four months of communication of the certified copy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 611 of 2023
Basudev Das
Petitioner
Mr. K.K. Pahil, Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha and others
Opposite Parties
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
19.01.2023
Arun
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to pension and other retiral benefits akin to those granted in Sarat Chandra Parida v. State of Odisha.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sarat Chandra Parida v. State of OdishaRelied on¶3
Sarat Chandra Parida v. State of Odisha, 2015 (II) ILR-CUT 94 · Who else cites this
W.P.(C) No.22316 of 2018Relied on¶4
W.P.(C) No.22316 of 2018
Basudev Das
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
B.R. Sarangi
Parties & counsel
