Single judge order refusing to entertain a writ petition regarding a threat of house demolition. The Court directed the petitioner to approach the common law forum instead and disposed of the petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 161 of 2023
Harihara Samal
….. Petitioner
Mr. S.Panda, Advocate
Vs.
Collector-cum-DM, Dhenkanal ….. Opposite Party and others
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
ORDER
18.01.2023
Arun
(DR. B.R. SARANGI, J.)
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the court should entertain a writ petition where the petitioner is threatened with demolition of his house.
Whether the petitioner should approach the common law forum instead of this court for redressal.
Harihara Samal
Collector-cum-DM, Dhenkanal
B.R. Sarangi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
