Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Shyam Sundar Mishra Vs State — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Orissa HC (2023)

Home
Orissa HC
2023
Shyam Sundar Mishra Vs StateShyam Sundar Mishra v. State

Dismissed

Shyam Sundar Mishra v. State

Orissa HC10 May 2023WP(C)/6059/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Orissa disposed of a writ petition as infructuous due to the efflux of time. The matter was taken up through hybrid mode.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

W.P.(C) No.6059 of 2010

Shyam Sundar Mishra

….. Petitioner

Mr. Ramakanta Mohanty, Sr. Advocate

Vs.

State of Odisha & others

Opposite Parties

Mr. Sanjib Swain, Advocate (for O.Ps.2 &3)

CORAM:

DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMAN

ORDER

10.05.2023

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Shyam Sundar Mishra
respondent
State of Odisha

Coram

AI extract

Dr. Justice B.R. Sarangi

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 10 May 2023 · May
Registered: 29 Mar 2010
Case no.: WP(C)/6059/2010

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from B.r.sarangi Murahari Sri Raman

Samir Mohapatra andORS Vs State and Ors.
9 May 2023
M/S.Bata India Ltd. Vs P.O.Industrial Tribu
9 May 2023
Sushil Ku.Patnaik Vs State of Odisha
9 May 2023
M/S Bilt Graphic Pap Vs State and Ors.
10 May 2023

Cite this judgement

Shyam Sundar Mishra v. State, WP(C)/6059/2010 (OD), decided on 10 May 2023.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Dr. Justice B.R. Sarangi and Mr. Justice M.S. Raman

Parties & counsel

Outcome

The writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The High Court held that due to the efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous and accordingly stood disposed of.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous.

In view of the above submission, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous.

(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE (M.S. RAMAN) MRS JUDGE MANOR Digitally signed by ANJAN MANORANJAN SAMAL SAMAL Date: 2023.05.10 16:58:50 +05'30'

Mr. Justice M.S. Raman

CNR

ODHC010021582010

Topic

Constitutional and Fundamental Rights

Bench

B.r.sarangi Murahari Sri Raman

Disposal

Disposed Off

All Orissa Judicial Vs State

10 May 2023

Sattar Mohammed Vs Madhusudan Padhy

10 May 2023