The contempt proceeding initiated in this matter was dropped as the petitioner was absent and had not responded to the notice, indicating lack of interest in pursuing the case.
Contempt proceeding dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.951 of 2013
Sattar Mohammed
….. Petitioner
None
Vs.
Madhusudan Padhy, IAS & ….. Opposite Parties
another
Mr. A.K. Mishra, AGA
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMAN
ORDER
10.05.2023
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE (M.S. RAMAN) MRS JUDGE MANOR Digitally signed by ANJAN MANORANJAN SAMAL SAMAL Date: 2023.05.10 16:54:56 +05'30'
Sattar Mohammed
Madhusudan Padhy
B.R. Sarangi
M.S. Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
