Sudhansu Sekhar Sahoo v. State of Orissa
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous due to efflux of time during a hybrid hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.4997 of 2015
Sudhansu Sekhar Sahoo
Petitioner
Mr. Jaydeep Pal, Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha & Others
Opposite Parties State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMAN
ORDER
20.03.2023
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 03. 2. It is stated that by efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI)
JUDGE
(M.S. RAMAN)
JUDGE
Alok/Laxmikant
Page 1 of 1
Sudhansu Sekhar Sahoo
State of Odisha
B.R. Sarangi
M.S. Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court