Single-judge order dismissing an application for modification of a judgment transferring a writ petition to a contempt petition, observing the original wording is correct.
Application for modification of judgment dismissed with no correction.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P (C) No.391 of 2023
Mamata Moharana ….. Petitioner Mr. S.K. Mishra, Advocate Vs. Authorized officer, Punjab National ….. Opposite Parties Bank, Circle Sastra Centre, Circle Office, Cuttack & Others
Mr. S. Ghosh, Advocate
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN
ORDER
07.07.2023
Order No. I.A. No.9547 of 2023 03. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. This application has been filed by the Petitioner for modification of the order dated 20th March, 2023 by substituting the words “writ petition” in place of “contempt petition” in the third paragraph of the such orders.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
(M.S. RAMAN) JUDGE Laxmikant Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: LAXMIKANT MOHAPATRA Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, C UTT ACK Date: 10-Jul-2023 09:50:03
Mamata Moharana
Authorized officer, Punjab National Bank & Others
B.R. Sarangi
M.S. Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
