A writ petition assailing a revisional order was dismissed as infructuous because the underlying civil suit had already been disposed of by the lower courts, rendering the current impugned order no longer subsisting.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA SAHOO Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 24-Aug-2023 17:12:54
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 27885 OF 2011
Suresh Chandra Meher
…. Petitioner
Ms. Rupali Moharana, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Amar Kumar Mohanty, Advocate
-versus-
…. Opp. Party Mr. S.B. Udgata, Advocate
Sushila Bai Patel
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
23.08.2023
judgment dated 20th August, 2011 (Annexure-2) passed by learned Additional District Judge, Sambalpur in Civil Revision Petition No.12/4 of 2007-08, whereby dismissing the revision, learned Revisional Court confirmed the order dated 20th November, 2007 (Annexure-1) passed by learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Sambalpur in C.M.A. No.1 of 2002 allowing an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC and thereby setting aside the ex parte decree passed in T.S. No.144 of 1995.
Page 1 of 2
Signature Not Verified
// 2 //
Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA SAHOO Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 24-Aug-2023 17:12:54
ms
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Page 2 of 2
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Suresh Chandra Meher
Sushila Bai Patel
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
