High Court disposed of a writ petition by directing the competent authority to apply the decision in Ashok Kumar Mohapatra to the petitioner's case within two months.
Directed the competent authority to dispose of the petitioner's case applying the decision in Ashok Kumar Mohapatra within two months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P. (C) No. 3037 of 2023
Jayantee Kumari Sarangi
Petitioner
Mr. N.C. Moharana, Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha and Others
Opposite parties
State Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
17.02.2023
01
3 Learned counsel for both the parties agreed that the issue involved in this writ petition is analogues to one involved in O.A. No. 1668 of 2017 ( Ashok Kumar Mohapatra v. State of Orissa ), which was disposed of by the Odisha Administrative Tribunal vide judgment dated 09.10.2018 and confirmed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.6698 of 2020 and further confirmed by the apex Court in SLP(C) No.15573 of 2020.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Subrat
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's case must be disposed of by the competent authority in light of the decision in Ashok Kumar Mohapatra.
Whether the decision in Ashok Kumar Mohapatra applies analogously to the facts of the present writ petition.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ashok Kumar Mohapatra v. State of OrissaFollowed¶3
O.A. No. 1668 of 2017 (Ashok Kumar Mohapatra v. State of Orissa)
W.P.(C) No.6698 of 2020Followed¶3
SLP(C) No.15573 of 2020Followed¶3
Jayantee Kumari Sarangi
State of Odisha
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
