The High Court disposed of a contempt petition filed for non-compliance with a previous judgment, granting the opposite parties one month further time to comply, with a warning of deliberate violation otherwise.
One month further time granted to comply with the earlier order dated 02.08.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
CONTC No.514 of 2023
Dr. Hemant Kumar Rath
….
Petitioner
-versus-
Bishnupada Sethi, I.A.S. & Anr.
…. Opposite Parties
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER
16.02.2023
Order No
01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties.
3. This Contempt Petition has been filed by the Petitioner for noncompliance of the Judgment dated 02.08.2022 passed by this Court in FAO No. 727 of 2018.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and upon hearing learned counsel for the Parties, this Contempt Petition is disposed of by granting one month further time to the Opp. PartiesContemnors to comply the order passed on 02.08.2022. However, if the order is not complied with within the extended time, it will be held as deliberate violation of this Court’s order.
(Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge
Sneha
Dr. Hemant Kumar Rath
Bishnupada Sethi
Biraj Prasanna Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
