Disposed

Harsamani Dei v. State of Odisha

Orissa HC10 Mar 2023WP(C)/2966/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single Judge order disposing of a writ petition seeking regularization of pay and allowance. Court directed the Commissioner-cum-Secretary to decide a pending representation within two months via a reasoned order and communicate the decision within two weeks. The petition was disposed of by this direction.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was disposed of; the Court directed the Commissioner-cum-Secretary to consider the pending representation and pass a reasoned order within two months and communicate the decision wit

Harsamani Dei Vs State of Odisha — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Orissa HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

¶2

W.P.(C) No.2966 of 2023

¶3

Harsamani Dei …. Petitioner Mr. S. Rath , Advocate

¶4

-versus-

¶5

State of Odisha and others

¶6

…. Opposite Parties Mr. R.N. Mishra, A.G.A.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA

ORDER

Order No.

10.03.2023

This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode).

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the State. Perused the writ petition as well as documents annexed thereto.

¶15

The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:

¶16

“Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, it is therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to:

¶17

(i) admit / allow this Writ Application;

¶18

(ii) direct / order the Opp. Party No.1 for drawal and disbursal of differential salary and allowances for the period from April 1999 to July 2011 of Lady Supervisor against which post, she has been discharging her duties, being posted / kept in charge as Lady Supervisor, but was only drawing salary of Lady Village Level Worker;

¶19

(iii) direct / order the Opp. Party No.1 to lawfully act upon the representation as at Annexure-3 of the Petitioner and to grant appropriate and

¶20

// 2 //

¶21

lawful relief(s) in the interest of justice;

¶22

(iv) pass such other order(s) or issue direction(s) as may be deemed fit and proper in the bona fide interest of justice;”

¶23

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that although the petitioner has filed representation dated 22.06.2022 under Annexure-3 before the Commissioner-cum-Secretary to Government of Odisha, Women and Child Development Department, BhubaneswarOpposite Party No.1 the same is still pending before the said Opposite party and the said Opposite Party have not taken any decision as of now.

¶24

Considering the submissions made, the limited nature of grievance of the petitioner, this Court disposes of the writ petition at the stage of admission with a direction to the Commissioner-cum-Secretary to Government of Odisha, Women and Child Development Department, Bhubaneswar-Opposite Party No.1 to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 22.06.2022 under Annexure-3 taking into account Annexures-1 and 2 in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. It is needless to mention here that the representation of the petitioner shall be considered and disposed of by passing a speaking and reasoned order. Any decision so taken on the said representation shall be communicated to the petitioner within a period of two weeks thereafter.

¶25

With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition is disposed of.

¶26

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

¶27

Jagabandhu

¶28

// 3 //

Harsamani Dei v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harsamani Dei v. State of Odisha

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Emroj Ansari @ Emroz @ Sk. Babu Vs State of Odisha

Kuna @ Santosh Kumar Bhoi Vs State of Odisha

Shree Vidya Niketan College of Medical Science and Research, Bbsr Vs State of Odisha

Tana Murmu Vs Usha Padhi, I.A.S.

Subash Chandra Mahanta Vs Niranjan Mishra, Director, Public Health, Odisha

Manoj Kumar Sethy Vs G Mathi Vathanan, I.A.S.