The High Court allowed an application seeking permission to withdraw a writ petition following a settlement between the petitioners and the opposite party company. Subsequently, the main writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn on the same day.
i.a. allowed; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 2815 of 2022
Ramesh Munda and Ors. ..…... Petitioners Mr. Omkar Devdas, Advocate
-versus-
Union of India and Others …… Opposite Parties
Mr. B.K. Padhi,CGA
(for O.P. No.1)
Mr. D. Nayak, AGA
(for O.P. Nos.2 to 5)
Mr.P.K. Muduli, Advocate
(for O.P. No.6)
CORAM:
JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA
JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
03.07.2023
I.A. No.7456 of 2023
Order No.
10. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode.
2
(S. Talapatra) Judge
(Savitri Ratho) Judge
W.P.(C) No.2815 of 2022
Order No.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: LITARAM MURMU Designation: Sr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court Cuttack Date: 04-Jul-2023 15:33:38
(S. Talapatra) Judge
(Savitri Ratho)
Judge
Ramesh Munda and Ors.
Union of India and Others
S. Talapatra
Savitri Ratho
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
