Minati Rath v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court set aside the impugned order of the Assistant Settlement Officer based on a prior judgment. It directed the ASO to record the petitioner's name in the register of rights within eight weeks and to cancel any entry in the government's name.
What did the court decide?
Set aside the impugned order; directed recording of petitioner's name within eight weeks; directed cancellation of government entry if present.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No. 20344 of 2014
Minati Rath
…. Petitioner
Mr. B. Sahoo, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties Mr. Debakanta Mohanty Additional Government Advocate
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN
ORDER 11.01.2023
Order No.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the impugned order of the Assistant Settlement Officer should be set aside.
Whether the petitioner should be recorded in the Register of Rights.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Minati Rath
- respondent
State of Odisha
Coram
M.S. Raman
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court