This High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an order under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as infructuous, noting the matter had become so in the interim. An interim order was vacated.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: MADHUSMITA SAHOO Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 29-Nov-2023 19:13:33
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 19800 OF 2011 Pradeep Kumar Pandy …. Petitioner
Mr. V. Mohapatra, Advocate on behalf of
Mr. Ashok Kumar Mohapatra, Advocate
-versus-
Jitendra Nath Pattanaik @ Jitu …. Opp. Party Patnaik
Mr. Umesh Ch. Patnaik, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
28.11.2023
ms
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous due to subsequent inaction by the parties.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Pradeep Kumar Pandy
Jitendra Nath Pattanaik
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
