Writ petition filed for direction to remove encroachment on government land. Court allowed petition directing respondent to examine representation and pass final order within four weeks after affording hearing to encroacher.
Direction to opposite party No.3 to consider Annexure-2, provide hearing to opposite party No.4, and pass final order within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P. (C) No.19669 of 2023
Premalata Nayak
Petitioner
Mr. Satyanarayan Mishra, Advocate
-Versus-
State of Odisha & Others
…. Opposite Parties Mr.P.K.Rout, AGA
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER 11.07.2023
Order No.
Page 1 of 2
of the petitioner and to remove the alleged encroachment, representations submitted to opposite party Nos. 2 & 3 under Annexures-1 & 2 respectively, however, no action has been taken thereon till date and hence, necessary direction is required to be issued in that regard.
7. Accordingly, it is ordered.
kabita
(R.K. Pattanaik) Signature Not Verified Judge
Digitally Signed Signed by: KABITARANI MAJHI Designation: Secretary Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, Cuttack Date: 12-Jul-2023 18:38:31
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to issue direction to respondent to examine representation regarding encroachment on government land.
Premalata Nayak
State of Odisha
Mr.P.K.Rout
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
