Banamali Jena v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C)…
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.18099of 2014
Banamali Jena …. Petitioner
Mr. P.K. Das, Advocate & Mr. D.Sahoo, Advocate
-Versus-
State of Odisha and Another …. Opposite Parties
Mr. YSP Babu, AGA
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICER.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
10.07.2023
Order No.
05. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has no
instruction in the matter.
2. Considering the above submission, the writ petition stands
dismissed for non-prosecution.
(R.K.Pattanaik)
Judge
KABITA
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: KABITARANI MAJHI Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, CTC Date: 11-Jul-2023 19:02:04
Banamali Jena
State of Odisha
R.K. Pattanaik
Kabita Ranji Mahi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court