The court disposed of a writ petition challenging a Form-B eviction notice. It directed the petitioner to approach the appellate authority, Sub-Collector, Cuttack, while maintaining status quo during the appeal.
Writ petition disposed; liberty granted to approach appellate authority; status quo maintained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.17548 of 2023
Sisir Kumar Swain …. Petitioner Mr. S. Mishra-1, Advocate
-Versus-
State of Orissa & Others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. YSP Babu, AGA
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
Order No.
ORDER 05.07.2023
Page 1 of 2
Annexure-5 is appealable in nature, the petitioner should approach the authority concerned under the provisions of the OPLE Act.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BALARAM BEHERA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUT TACK Date: 06-Jul-2023 15:11:26
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner should be directed to approach the appellate forum instead of challenging the eviction notice directly in the High Court.
Whether the writ petition regarding the eviction notice should be admitted or disposed of.
Sisir Kumar Swain
State of Orissa
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
