Sitaram Dhiman v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed in 2004. Petitioners sought adjournment due to misplaced brief. Court refused adjournment due to age of matter but granted liberty to file further in case cause of action survives. Petition disposed of.
What did the court decide?
Liberty granted to petitioners to restore the writ petition if cause of action survives.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WP(C) No.13849 of 2004
Sitaram Dhiman and Others
…. Petitioner
Mr. B. Routray, Advocate
-Versus-
State of Orissa and Others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. P.K. Rout, AGA CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK ORDER
04.07.2023
Order No.
- Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the brief is misplaced and on such ground, prays for an adjournment.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a writ petition can be disposed of when the brief is misplaced due to its age.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Sitaram Dhiman and Others
- respondent
State of Orissa
Coram
R. K. Pattanaik
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court