Rajani Moharatha v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
In a writ petition concerning lease cancellation and record restoration, the Court disposed of the matter by quashing the impugned order, relying on a previous judgment in identical facts involving the same order.
What did the court decide?
Impugned order dated 11.08.1998 passed by Additional District Magistrate, Khurda in Lease Revision Case No.900 of 1998 stood quashed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.17436 of 2009
Rajani Moharatha
Petitioner
Mr.S.K. Samantaray, Advocate
Vs.
State of Orissa & Ors.
….. Opposite Parties Mr. J.P. Patnaik, GA
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMAN
ORDER
15.03.2023
- Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether writ petition seeking quashment of lease cancellation and record restoration order should be disposed of on basis of identical order quashed in earlier co-purchaser litigation.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Rajani Moharatha
- respondent
State of Orissa
Coram
B.R. Sarangi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court