The Writ Court declined to entertain a writ petition challenging a notice under Section 14(1) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, granting liberty to approach the appropriate forum instead.
Liberty granted to pursue remedy before the appropriate forum. Writ petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P (C) No.1251 of 2023
Birajini Devi & Another
Petitioners
Mr. Gopal Prasad Jena, Advocate
Vs.
The Collector and District Magistrate, Khordha & Others
Opposite Parties
State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE M.S.RAMAN
ORDER
14.03.2023
With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition stands disposed
of.
(DR. B.R. SARANGI) JUDGE
(M.S. RAMAN) JUDGE
Alok/Laxmikant
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can entertain a writ petition challenging a notice issued under Section 14(1) of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Birajini Devi & Another
The Collector and District Magistrate, Khordha & Others
DR. B.R. SARI
M.S. RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
