Petitioner sought writ relief due to non-acceptance of an online application caused by technical issues. The matter became infructuous after a previous order mandated registration, which had already been accepted by the respondent commission.
The writ petition was declared infructuous and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
WPC No.17202 of 2023
Satyabhama Palai
…. Petitioner Mr. B. Mohapatra, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha & others
…. Opposite Parties Mr. I. Mohanty, ASC
CORAM:
JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
27.06.2023
// 2 //
23.05.2023 of this Court by the Hon’ble Vacation Judge directed given to Opposite Party No.4 i.e. Secretary, Odisha Sub-ordinate Staff Selection Commission to permit the Petitioner to register for selection of MPHW (F).
Anil
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: ANIL KUMAR SAHOO Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa Date: 27-Jun-2023 18:34:36
Satyabhama Palai
State of Odisha
A.K. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
