In this writ petition challenging a civil court order allowing further evidence, the respondents were represented, but no petitioner appeared. The High Court dismissed the writ petition for non-prosecution and vacated a relevant interim order.
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; interim order of 21st July 2011 vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C). NO.16520 OF 2011
Surjyamani Durga and others …. Petitioners
None
-versus-
Manju Durga and others
…. Opp. Parties Mr. H.K. Mund, Advocate
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
18.08.2023
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Signature Not Verified Rojalin
Digitally Signed Signed by: ROJALIN NAYAK Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 21-Aug-2023 12:32:14
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed for non-prosecution in the absence of the petitioner.
Surjyamani Durga and others
Manju Durga and others
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
