Narayan Kedia v. Prasanta Ku.Patnaik
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner appealed an order rejecting an adjournment in an execution case. Counsel for the petitioner was non-prosecutive. The writ petition was dismissed.
Petitioner appealed an order rejecting an adjournment in an execution case. Counsel for the petitioner was non-prosecutive. The writ petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C). NO.13361 OF 2011
Narayan Kedia
…. Petitioner
Mr. Abhisek Agarwal, Advocate on behalf of Mr. S.P. Mishra, Senior Advocate
-versus-
Prasanta Kumar Patanaik …. Opp. Party
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
Order No.
ORDER 18.08.2023
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Rojalin Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: ROJALIN NAYAK Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 21-Aug-2023 12:32:14
Page 1 of 1
Narayan Kedia
Prasanta Kumar Patanaik
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court