Disposed
Surjit Singh Makhija v. State and Ors.
Orissa HCWP(C)/16363/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C).No.16363 of 2013
Surjit Singh Makhija ….
Petitioner
Mr. P.K.Nayak, Advocate& Associates
-Versus-
State of Odisha & others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr. P.K.Rout, AGA
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
12.12.2023
Order No.
07. Since it is brought to the notice of the Court by the learned
counsel for the petitioner that the demolition has already taken
place in violation of the Court’s order dated 4 th March, 2020, the
writ petition has become infructuous and accordingly, the same
stands disposed of.
(R.K.Pattanaik)
Judge
kabita
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: KABITARANI MAJHI Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, CTC Date: 13-Dec-2023 12:42:23
Surjit Singh Makhija
State of Odisha
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court