The High Court of Orissa disposed of W.P.(C). No. 15106 of 2012 by the petitioner's counsel's submission that the writ petition became infructuous due to the efflux of time.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C). No.15106 of 2012
Dr. Chaitanya Charan Sethi
….. Petitioner Mr. S. Rath, Advocate
Vs.
State of Odisha & another
….. Opposite Parties State Counsel
CORAM:
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
ORDER
23.08.2023
Order No. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
07.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that by efflux of
time, the writ petition has become infructuous.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: MANORANJAN SAMAL Designation: PERSONAL ASSISTANT Reason: Authentication Location: Orissa High Court, Cuttack Date: 23-Aug-2023 17:10:41
Dr. Chaitanya Charan Sethi
State of Odisha
DR. B.R. SARANGI
MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
