Sunderlal Raimagiya v. Tahasildar,Basta
Case brief
What is this about?
writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioner's counsel submitted a memo stating they had no instructions to proceed with the matter.
writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution after the petitioner's counsel submitted a memo stating they had no instructions to proceed with the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.23215 of 2012
Sunderlal Raimagiya …. Petitioner M/s. A. P.Bose, Advocate & Associates
-Versus-
Tahasildar, Basta
…. Opposite Party
Ms. S. Mishra, ASC
CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
03.07.2023
Order No.
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: BALARAM BEHERA Designation: Senior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: ORISSA HIGH COURT, CUT TACK Date: 04-Jul-2023 15:06:01
Sunderlal Raimagiya
Tahasildar, Basta
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court