Disposed
Sangita Rana v. State
Orissa HCWP(C)/12522/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous due to passage of time, though liberty was granted to revive the application if cause of action survives.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed as infructuous; liberty granted to revive application.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
¶2
W.P.(C) No.12522 of 2014
¶3
Sangita Rana
¶4
Petitioner
¶5
Mr.P.K.Das, Advocate
¶6
-versus-
¶7
State of Odisha and others
¶8
…. Opposite Parties
¶9
Mr.N.K.Praharaj, A.G.A. Mr.B.Dash, Advocate for O.P.No.3
¶10
CORAM:
JUSTICE A.K.MOHAPATRA
ORDER
27.02.2023
Order No.
04. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual
/Physical Mode).
¶11
- On perusal of the prayer made in the writ petition, it appears that the matter has become infructuous with the passage of time.
¶12
- In such view of the matter, the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. However, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to revive this application in the event cause of action still survives.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Sangita Rana
- respondent
State of Odisha
Coram
AI extract
A.K. Mohapatra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court