The High Court of Orissa disposed of a writ petition as infructuous due to the passage of time, granting liberty to revive the application if the cause of action survives.
Liberty granted to petitioner to revive the application in the event cause of action still survives.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.3482 of 2013
GB, Jayakrushna College Petitioner
Mr.A.R.Panigrahi, Advocate
-versus-
State of Odisha and others
…. Opposite Parties
Mr.T.K.Patnaik, A.S.C.
Mr.B.Das, Advocate for O.P.No.3
CORAM: JUSTICE A.K.MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
24.02.2023
(A.K. Mohapatra) Judge
RKS
Page 1 of 2
GB, Jayakrushna College
State of Odisha
A.K. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
