Disposed
Kamalakanta Panda v. State
Orissa HCWP(C)/10635/2010
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The High Court of Odisha held that the writ petition had become infructuous due to efflux of time after counsel stated lack of instructions, and disposed of the matter accordingly.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
¶2
W.P (C) No. 10635 of 2010
¶3
Kamalakanta Panda
¶4
….. Petitioner
¶5
Mr. S.K. Sanganeria, Advocate
¶6
Vs.
¶7
….. State of Odisha & Others Opposite Parties
¶8
State Counsel
¶9
CORAM:
¶10
DR. JUSTICE B.R. SARANGI
¶11
MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
¶12
ORDER
¶13
05.01.2023
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Kamalakanta Panda
- respondent
State of Odisha
Coram
AI extract
B.R. Sarangi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court