The High Court of Orissa condoned the delay in filing an appeal. It dismissed the appeal where appellants challenged orders upholding a void land sale conducted without mandatory prior permission under Regulation-2 of 1956.
The application for condonation of delay was allowed; the present appeal was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.A. No. 301 of 2020
…. Rangaballav Kand and others Appellants
Mr. Niranjan Lenka, Advocate
-versus-
Additional District Magistrate, Mayurbhanj-cum-Appellate Authority and others
…. Respondents
Mr. Debakanta Mohanty Additional Government Advocate for State
Order No.
CORAM:
THE CHIEF JUSTICE
JUSTICE M.S. RAMAN
ORDER
20.01.2023
I.A. No.553 of 2020
W.A. No.301 of 2020
Page 1 of 2
(Dr. S. Muralidhar)
Chief Justice
(M.S. Raman)
Judge
S. Behera
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing the writ appeal should be condoned.
Whether the lower court's dismissal of the appeal regarding the validity of the land sale was correct.
Rangaballav Kand
Additional District Magistrate, Mayurbhanj-cum-Appellate Authority
M.S. Raman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
