The High Court of Orissa dismissed a year-old appeal filed in 1988 for default. The court refused to adjourn the matter despite the appellants' claim of no response due to repeated reminders.
The appeal is dismissed for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
SA No.144 of 1988
Kalakara Sahu & Others
…. Appellants
M/s. S. P. Mishra, Senior Advocate & Associate
-Versus-
Raj Kumar Sahoo & Others
…. Respondents Mr. A.K. Mohakud, Advocate
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER 19.07.2023
Order No. 22.
(R.K. Pattanaik) Judge
Tudu Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: THAKURDAS TUDU Reason: Authentication Location: OHC,CTC Date: 21-Jul-2023 11:24:18
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order should be dismissed for default due to lack of response year after filing.
Kalakara Sahu & Others
Raj Kumar Sahoo & Others
R.K. Pattanaik
Thakurdas Tudu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
