S.K.Noor Mahammad v. Sk.Rahim Bux
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court allowed an interim application to clarify a previous order, directing that it be read with subsequent typographical corrections to plot details.
What did the court decide?
The interim application to clarify the order dated 19th July, 2023, was disposed of; the original order shall be read with the typographical corrections regarding plot details.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
R.S.A. No.171 of 2004
Mr. A.Das, Advocate & Associates
-Versus-
Sk. Rahim Bux & Others
Mr. Ajodhya Nath Sahoo, Advocate for Respondents CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
Order No.
19.01.2024
- Heard Mr. Das, learned counsel for the petitioners/appellants and Mr. Sahoo, learned counsel for the respondents.
- Instant I.A. is filed for modification of the order dated 19th July, 2023 passed in RSA No. 171 of 2004 with regard to the typographical correction to be made therein with reference to paras- 3 & 4 of the same.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an interim application for typographical correction should be allowed based on court order.
Whether the impugned order needs to be read with the subsequent correction order.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
R.S.A. No.171 of 2004
- respondent
Sk. Rahim Bux
Coram
R.K. Pattanaik
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court