Single judge of the High Court of Orissa dismissed Special Appeal No.120 of 2002 for non-prosecution. Counsel for the appellant reported lack of instruction.
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
S.A No.120 of 2002
Sri Radha Govinda Jew Thakur
…. Appellant
Mr. A.P. Bose,Advocate
-Versus-
Brahmanda Prusty & Others
…. Respondents
CORAM:
MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK
ORDER
17.07.2023
Order No.
14. 1. Mr. Bose, learned counsel for the appellant submits that he
has no instruction as yetdespite necessary correspondence with
the appellant.
2. Learned counsel for the respondent is present.
3. In view of the above,the appeal stands dismissed for non-
prosecution.
(R.K.Pattanaik)
Judge
KABITA/ROJINA
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: ROJINA SAHOO Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: OHC, CTC Date: 19-Jul-2023 18:05:53
Sri Radha Govinda Jew Thakur
Brahmanda Prusty & Others
R.K. PATTANAIK
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
