The High Court of Odisha dismissed the writ petition as it lacked instructions from counsel. No substantive legal issues were addressed.
Nulla
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) No.17649 of 2017
Kamala Pradhan @ Kamala Bairiganjan …. Petitioner Mr. A. Tripathy, Advocate
-Versus-
State of Odisha & Others
…. Opposite parities
Mr. YSP Babu, AGA CORAM: MR. JUSTICE R.K. PATTANAIK ORDER 14.07.2023 Order No. 03. 1. On behalf of Mr. Tripathy, learned counsel for the petitioner, it is informed to the Court that there has been no instruction in the matter. 2. In view of the above, the writ petition stands dismissed. (R.K. Pattanaik) Judge
Tudu
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: THAKURDAS TUDU Designation: Sr. Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: OHC,CTC Date: 15-Jul-2023 13:49:36
Kamala Pradhan
State of Odisha
R.K. Pattanaik
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
