Dismissed
Durga Pr.Agarwalla v. Janardan Das
Orissa HCRSA/4/2016
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Appeal under Section 100 CPC filed assailing prior judgments was dismissed for non-prosecution as none appeared for the appellant.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution; interim order vacated.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
¶2
RSA NO. 4 OF 2016
¶3
-versus-
¶4
Janardan Das and others …. Respondents Mr. Monomoy Basu, Advocate (For Respondent No.1) Mr. A.C. Panda, Advocate (For Respondent No.4)
¶5
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA ORDER 03.01.2023
¶6
Order No.
¶8
- This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
¶9
- This appeal under Section 100 C.P.C. has been filed assailing the judgment and decree dated 24th December, 2015 passed by learned Additional District Judge, Baripada in R.F.A. No. 37 of 2014, whereby he confirmed the judgment and decree dated 15th July, 2014 and 23rd July, 2014 respectively passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Baripada in T.S. No. 10 of 1995.
¶10
- Since none appears for the Appellants to pursue the matter, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
RSA No. 4 of 2016
- respondent
Janardan Das and others
Coram
AI extract
K.R. Mohapatra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court