The High Court of Orissa disposed of the civil miscellaneous petition challenging an order allowing an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court refused an adjournment and dismissed the petition for non-prosecution.
Adjudication and disposition of the matter in favour of the respondent O.P.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No. 1097 OF 2014
Sankar Ghadei @ Sankarsan Ghadei …. Petitioner Mr. P. Sinha, Advocate
-versus-
Sukadev Dalei and another
…. Opp. Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
03.01.2023
23rd June, 2014 (Annexure-4) passed by learned District Judge, Nayagarh in R.F.A. No.17 of 2013, whereby an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act has been allowed.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
ms
Judge
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant an adjournment to reconstitute the misplaced file.
Whether this civil miscellaneous petition for revision is maintainable.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sankar Ghadei @ Sankarsan Ghadei
Sukadev Dalei
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
