A single-judge order in a revisional jurisdiction matter where the petitioner did not appear, resulting in the disposal of the application due to lack of brief.
The RPFAM was disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM NO. 77 OF 2012
Samarendra Samal …. Petitioner
None
-versus-
Radha Gobinda Samal
…. Opp. Party
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No. 04.08.2023
1. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. None appears for the Petitioner at the time of call.
3. Office note discloses that the brief is not available in the
section. Thus, the mater is placed for appropriate direction.
4. Since none appears to pursue the matter, no order, either
for reconstruction of the brief or otherwise, can be passed in this
case.
5. Accordingly, the RPFAM is disposed of.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
Rojalin
Signature Not Verified
Digitally Signed Signed by: ROJALIN NAYAK Designation: Junior Stenographer Reason: Authentication Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack Date: 04-Aug-2023 20:17:41
Page 1 of 1
Samarendra Samal
Radha Gobinda Samal
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
