Dismissed
Nirupama Sahoo v. Jitendra Pradhan
Orissa HCRPFAM/20/2011
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
RPFAM No. 20 of 2011 was disposed. The petitioner failed to appear. No order could be passed for request.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
¶2
RPFAM NO. 20 OF 2011
¶3
Nirupama Sahoo …. Petitioner
¶4
None
¶5
-versus-
¶6
Jitendra Pradhan …. Opp. Party
¶7
CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA ORDER
¶8
Order No.
¶9
04.08.2023
¶10
- This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. None appears for the Petitioner at the time of call.
3. Office note discloses that the brief is not available in the
section. Thus, the mater is placed for appropriate direction.
4. Since none appears to pursue the matter, no order, either
for reconstruction of the brief or otherwise, can be passed in this
case.
5. Accordingly, the RPFAM is disposed of.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
- This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Nirupama Sahoo
- respondent
Jitendra Pradhan
Coram
AI extract
K.R. Mohapatra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court