An ex parte disposal where the High Court dismissed a revision petition filed by Kailash Chandra Sahoo challenging a family court maintenance order due to the petitioner's non-appearance and non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No. 53 OF 2013
Kailash Chandra Sahoo …. Petitioner
None
-versus-
Padmabati Sahoo
…. Opp. Party
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
Order No.
ORDER 28.02.2023 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. None appears for the Petitioner at the time of call. 3. Order dated 22nd January, 2013 (Annexure-1) passed by learned Judge, Family Court, Bhubaneswar in I.A. No.121 of 2011 (arising out of C.P. No.662 of 2011) is under challenge in this RPFAM, whereby the Petitioner has been directed to pay maintenance @ Rs.3,000/- per month to the Opposite Party from the date of application, i.e., from 1st November, 2011 till final disposal of the civil proceeding along with other directions.
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
ms
Page 1 of 1
Kailash Chandra Sahoo
Padmabati Sahoo
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
