In a revision petition challenging a Family Court's maintenance order, the High Court of Orissa found the petitioner absent. The revision petition was dismissed for non-prosecution, and an interim order was vacated.
Revision petition dismissed for non-prosecution; interim order vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RPFAM No. 105 OF 2014
Pancha Naik @ Panchanana Naik …. Petitioner Mr. Satyabrata Panda, Advocate
-versus-
Mathura Sai and another
…. Opp. Party None
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
27.02.2023
ms
(K.R. Mohapatra) Judge
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the revision petition for challenging the Family Court's maintenance order should be allowed in the absence of the petitioner's appearance.
Whether the interim order dated 5th September, 2014 should be vacated.
Pancha Naik @ Panchanana Naik
K.R. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
