Anjarana Banka v. a.Kuri
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Orissa dismissed a revision petition and the accompanying application for condonation of delay regarding an unexplained inordinate lapse of over five years.
What did the court decide?
Misc. Case No. 414 of 2017 is dismissed. The RPFAM stands dismissed being barred by limitation.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RPFAM No. 300 OF 2017
Anjarana Banka …. Petitioners Mr. Abinash Swain, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Shashi Bhusan Jena, Advocate
-versus-
A. Kuri
…. Opp. Party
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
26.04.2023
Misc. Case No.414 of 2017 & RPFAM No. 300 OF 2017
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a revision petition under Article 227 allowing condonation of delay is maintainable after more than five years when the delay remains unexplained.
Whether the grounds regarding starvation and retirement dues cited in a petition for condonation of delay are sufficient to waive the bar of limitation.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anjarana Banka
- respondent
A. Kuri
Coram
K.R. Mohapatra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court