The Police Complaint filed by the petitioner challenging an order staying suit proceedings was disposed of. The Court held that the petitioner's prayer regarding non-compliance by the defendants should be made before the learned trial Court without interfering with the impugned order.
CMP disposed of without interfering with the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CMP No.25 OF 2020
Khirod Kumar Ota
…. Petitioner
Mr. T.K.Choudhury, Advocate On behalf of Mr. Pravas Chandra Panda, Advocate
-versus-
Laxmidhar Ota and others …. Opp. Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
25.04.2023
by learned Senior Civil Judge, Nilagiri passed in CS No.24 of 2013 is under challenge in this CMP, whereby allowing an application under Section 10 CPC, learned trial Court directed stay of proceeding of the suit till disposal of RFA No.282 of 1982.
Page 1 of 2
// 2 //
made by learned counsel for the Petitioner can be made before learned trial Court.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
s.s.satapathy
Page 2 of 2
Khirod Kumar Ota
Laxmidhar Ota
K.R. Mohapatra
S.S. Satapathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
