Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Sanatan Kuanar Vs Minati Jena — Maintenance and Alimony | Orissa HC (2023)

Home
Orissa HC
2023
Sanatan Kuanar Vs Minati JenaSanatan Kuanar v. Minati Jena

Dismissed

Sanatan Kuanar v. Minati Jena

Orissa HC19 Apr 2023RPFAM/164/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition for revision in family maintenance order dismissed on settlement between parties without interfering with impugned order.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RPFAM No. 164 OF 2017

Sanatan Kuanar

…. Petitioner Ms. Mamata Mishra, Advocate

-versus-

Minati Jena

…. Opp. Party Mr. Prasanta Kumar Jena, Advocate

CORAM:

JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA

ORDER

Order No.

19.04.2023

This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Sanatan Kuanar

Coram

AI extract

K.R. Mohapatra

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 19 Apr 2023 · April
Registered: 21 Jul 2017
Case no.: RPFAM/164/2017

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from K.r.mohapatra

Devi Gidwani Vs Nimish Atha
18 Apr 2023
Manoranjan Sing Vs Pratima Sing
18 Apr 2023
Jayanti Sundaray Vs State of Odisha
18 Apr 2023
Aruna Klu.Muduli Vs Runita Muduli
19 Apr 2023

Cite this judgement

Sanatan Kuanar v. Minati Jena, RPFAM/164/2017 (OD), decided on 19 April 2023.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

K.R. Mohapatra

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Revision petition filed against maintenance order directed to pay Rs. 2,000/- monthly. Learned counsel for both parties stated that a settlement has been arrived at between the parties seeking and therefore, the revision petition is disposed of without interfering with the impugned order.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

Order dated 30^th January, 2015 (Annexure-1) passed by learned Judge, Family Court, Jajpur in Criminal Proceeding No.1 of 2013 is under challenge in this RPFAM, whereby the Petitioner has been directed to pay maintenance of Rs.2,000/- per month to the Opposite Party from the date of the application, i.e., from 2^nd January, 2013.

Ms. Mishra, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the brief has been taken back by the Petitioner stating that there is a settlement between the parties.

Mr. Jena, learned counsel for the Opposite Party also submits that a settlement has already been arrived at between the parties.

In that view of the matter, the RPFAM is disposed of as such without interfering with the impugned order under Annexure-1.

Judge

ms

Page 1 of 1

CNR

ODHC010067802017

Topic

Maintenance and Alimony

Bench

Disposal

Disposed Off

Debendranath Rout Vs State of Odisha

19 Apr 2023

Sidhartha Ku.Pradhan Vs Swati Patsani

19 Apr 2023