Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Sabita Padhan Vs Gopal Pradhan — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Orissa HC (2023)

Home
Orissa HC
2023
Sabita Padhan Vs Gopal PradhanSabita Padhan v. Gopal Pradhan

Dismissed

Sabita Padhan v. Gopal Pradhan

Orissa HC12 May 2023MATA/139/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

No summary available for a disposal by default due to non-prosecution of the appellant.

What the court decided

AI extract

A

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

MATA No. 139 of 2018

Sabita Padhan

….. Appellant None

Vs.

Gopal Padhan

….. Respondent Mr. T.K. Mohanty, Adv.

CORAM:

JUSTICE S.TALAPATRA

JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO

ORDER

12.05.2023

Order No.

Parties & counsel

AI extract

appellant
Sabita Padhan
respondent
Gopal Padhan

Coram

AI extract

S. Talapatra

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Orissa HC
Decided on: 12 May 2023 · May
Registered: 18 Dec 2018
Case no.: MATA/139/2018

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Subhasis Talapatra Miss Savitri Ratho

M/S Sambandh Finserve Pvt. Ltd., Rourkela Vs Asst. Director of Income Tax, Cpc, Bengaluru
11 May 2023
Madhusmita Sethi Vs Ranjit Kumar Sethi
11 May 2023
Bichitra Padhi Vs State of Odisha
11 May 2023
M/S. B.v.Enterprises Vs Joint Commissioner of Sales Tax, Ganjam Circle
12 May 2023

Cite this judgement

Sabita Padhan v. Gopal Pradhan, MATA/139/2018 (OD), decided on 12 May 2023.

The High Court of Orissa publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

S. Talapatra and Savitri Ratho

Parties & counsel

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution as the Appellant did not appear to represent their case on the date the matter was taken up.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.

None appears for the Appellant when the matter is taken up.

By the order dated 28.03.2023, it had been clearly observed that no further accommodation will be made on the next date.

When the matter is taken up today, there is no representation for the Appellant.

Mr. T.K. Mohanty, learned counsel has appeared for the Respondent.

Consequently, this appeal stands dismissed for nonprosecution.

SUKANTA Digitally signed by SUKANTA KUMAR KUMAR BEHERA Date: 2023.05.12 BEHERA 16:55:14 +05'30'

(S.Talapatra) Judge

Sukanta

(Savitri Ratho) Judge

Page 1 of 1

Savitri Ratho

CNR

ODHC010548092018

Topic

Constitutional and Fundamental Rights

Bench

Subhasis Talapatra Miss Savitri Ratho

Disposal

Disposed Off

Sanatan Nayak Vs Govt. of Odisha

12 May 2023

Niranjan Dash Vs Republic of India

12 May 2023