Prabhakar Patra v. Hrusikesh Panda
Case brief
What is this about?
An order from a National Lok Adalat dismissing the appellant's case due to absence of counsel and pending compromises between other co-defendants. No substantive order or disposal recorded.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK MACA No.1202 of 2015
Prabhakar Patra
Appellant
-versus-
Hrusikesh Panda and … Respondents another
Mr. A.A. Khan, Advocate (R-2)
CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY
ORDER(ORAL)
17.03.2024
Order No.
12.
- This matter is taken up in the 1st National Lok Adalat today.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Prabhakar Patra
- respondent
Hrusikesh Panda
Coram
G. Satapathy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court