State v. Satchida N.Panigrahi
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal disposed as infructuous because the impugned judgment had already been implemented and the respondents had received the benefit. No legal issue was decided.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
FAO No.132 of 2008
State of Odisha & Another
…. Appellants Mr. S.K. Samal,AGA
-versus-
Sachidananda Panigrahi & …. Respondents Another Mr. S.K. Das, Adv.
Mr. S.K. Das, Adv. (for Respondent No.1 Mr. S.C. Das, Adv. (for respondent No.2)
CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY
ORDER 12.04.2023
Order No 04. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode.
2. Heard Mr. S.K. Samal, learned Additional Govt. Advocate, Mr. S.K. Das, learned counsel appearing for private Respondent No.1 and Mr. S.C. Dash, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent No.2.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State of Odisha & Another
- respondent
Sachidananda Panigrahi & Another
Coram
Biraja Prasanna Satapathy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court