Bismita Panda v. M/S.Cesco Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK FAO No.117…
What did the court decide?
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
FAO No.117 of 2007
Bismita Panda and Others …. Appellants Ms. D. Parida on behalf of Mr. R.N. Biswal, Advocate
-versus-
M/s. CESCO Ltd. and Another …. Respondents CORAM: SHRI JUSTICE B. P. ROUTRAY ORDER 6.3.2023 Order No. 05. 1. The matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Ms. D. Parida submits on behalf of Mr. R.N. Biswal, learned counsel for the Appellants for withdrawal of the appeal. 3. Accordingly the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. ( B.P. Routray) Judge
M.K.Panda
Bismita Panda and Others
M/s. CESCO Ltd. and Another
B.P. Routray
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court