The High Court of Orissa disposed of a Civil Revision Petition challenging the rejection of a withdrawal suit prayer. The court found no illegality in the trial court's order but granted liberty to file an amendment application within two weeks.
Liberty granted to file an amendment application within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRP No.12 of 2023
G. Nageswar Rao
…. Petitioner
Mr. Dpiti Ranjan Bhokta, Advocate
-versus-
N. Jagannath Rao and others
Opp. Parties
CORAM:
JUSTICE A.K. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No.
23.03.2023
// 2 //
necessary parties have not been added to the suit. It has also been stated in the said petition that since the hearing has already commenced, it may not be possible on the part of the plaintiff to amend the plaint.
// 3 //
Petitioner has been rejected.
( A.K. Mohapatra) Judge
Debasis
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the trial court committed any illegality in rejecting the petitioner's petition to withdraw the suit.
Whether the petitioner should be granted liberty to file an amendment application instead of withdrawing the suit.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
G. Nageswar Rao
N. Jagannath Rao
A.K. Mohapatra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
